Oh...sorry. I didn't understand your point, i must be wearing my stupid hat. Yeah... that might help. If anyone wants to he's still on the HC board. You could probably PM him. I'm not sure if it's best just to have no contact with him and hope he forgets. but maybe explain things to him would be better.
Fairyliquid: We do not go out of our way to establish outreach programs for problem posters. We strongly frown upon private actions by the individual that circumvent the will of the community. We are NOT Tonyland. We do not need newbies like Jaunty. We have tried countless times to advise jaunty on how to fit in. More to the point, Jaunty himself has chosen how to approach us. His choices have always been bad. I have to say, from what you've said about this situation, it truely sounds like you are utterly unaware of what's already transpired with this guy.
appearantly I crossposted a good bit, dunno how. I want to reiterate this loud and clearly: [b:d9cc111ebe]Until the community as a whole has dictated a change in policy, we do not sanction private and individual action to resolve conflicts with problem posters. Attempts to help someone fit in after the community has demonstrated it is clearly in favor of banning them outright can only be construed as an attempt to subvert and antagonize the community.[/b:d9cc111ebe] in short: you can offer Jaunty any help you want for becoming a better person, but not to fit in on these boards after we've decided to ban him. [/b]
er. it has been suggested that i've misread something. that is quite possible. if fairyliquid just wants to make Jaunty feel better in the hopes he'll leave us alone, that's an altogether different matter. in THAT case, i still advise against it, and i fully believe it will only be a waste of her time, but hell, go right ahead.
Ok, I think it's pretty obivous what the community thinks here. Lets say give it anoth 24hours then close the vote? (we'll need to sort out proper voting times, but we can do that in ther other thread) That sound ok, seconds?
Ban the little dag*. I've lost my patience in dealing with him long ago. *10 point to whoever tells me what this means in australia. Spikey and the other aussies only get 5 though.
[quote:8d303c47d3="Pepster"]Ban the little dag*. I've lost my patience in dealing with him long ago. *10 point to whoever tells me what this means in australia. Spikey and the other aussies only get 5 though.[/quote:8d303c47d3]I've heard it dozens of times on soaps, I always assumed it meant uncool, old fashioned or a party poop or something like that - I'm guessing though, being Australian, it's origins are something far more derogatory?
[quote:c0d67c1cf5="Pepster"]Ban the little dag*. I've lost my patience in dealing with him long ago. *10 point to whoever tells me what this means in australia. Spikey and the other aussies only get 5 though.[/quote:c0d67c1cf5] The errrr matted (dont ask by what!) hair near the rear end of a sheep?
good grief. Okay, Personal suggestion: after the vote goes into effect, can we please count this as a coventry and not even TALK about the guy again? I think he only wants attention of any sort, and it's time to starve him to death in that respect.
[quote:d9bbf5ebcc="Garner"]after the vote goes into effect, can we please count this as a coventry and not even TALK about the guy again? I think he only wants attention of any sort, and it's time to starve him to death in that respect.[/quote:d9bbf5ebcc] I second that.
[quote:772ab02178="sleepy_sarge"][quote:772ab02178="Pepster"]Ban the little dag*. I've lost my patience in dealing with him long ago. *10 point to whoever tells me what this means in australia. Spikey and the other aussies only get 5 though.[/quote:772ab02178] The errrr matted (dont ask by what!) hair near the rear end of a sheep?[/quote:772ab02178] 10 out of 10. This may aswell count as coventry.
I see there is one more no vote. They don't have to, but I would appreciate if whoever made it would say who they are, and, even better, tell us the reason why. Valid objections should be heard.
At my last count we were also down one on who had voted for banning as well. So it'd be good if those two came forward.
It's probably someone new from the old board that's joined here, doesn't make any difference really. P.S. I meant one fo those three people still there.
